The Company has evaluated the recently issued statements and interpretations of the Financial Accounting Standards Board. To the extent they are applicable, the above pronouncements have primarily resulted in additional financial statement disclosure. None of these pronouncements have had, or are expected to have, a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for a more detailed discussion of the requirements and applicability of these statements.
The Company’s significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. Senior management has discussed the development and selection of critical accounting estimates and disclosures with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The application of accounting policies necessarily requires judgments and the use of estimates by a company’s management. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Management considers it important to assure that all appropriate costs are recognized on a timely basis. In cases where capitalization of costs is required (e.g. certain pre-production costs), stringent realization criteria are applied before capitalization is permitted.
The depreciable lives of fixed assets are intended to reflect their true economic life, taking into account such factors as product life cycles and expected changes in technology. Assets are periodically reviewed for realizability and appropriate valuation allowances are established when evidence of impairment exists. Impairment of long-lived assets has generally not been significant. Start-up operations are given a reasonable time to develop before impairment provisions are considered.
The Company has reserves for bad debts and excess and obsolete inventories. Accounts receivable are evaluated on a specific identification basis.
The Company has guidelines for calculating provisions for bad debts based on the age of receivables. In determining the amount of a bad debt reserve, management uses its judgment to consider factors such as the prior experience of the Company, the experience of other enterprises in the same industry, the debtor’s ability to pay and/or an appraisal of current economic conditions.
Inventories are evaluated based on individual or, in some cases, groups of inventory items. Reserves are established to reduce the value of inventories to the lower of cost or market, with market generally defined as net realizable value for finished goods and replacement cost for raw materials and work-in-process. Excess inventories are quantities of items that exceed anticipated sales or usage for a reasonable period. The Company has guidelines for calculating provisions for excess inventories based on the number of months of inventories on hand compared to anticipated sales or usage. Management uses its judgment to forecast sales or usage and to determine what constitutes a reasonable period.
There can be no assurance that the amount ultimately realized for receivables and inventories will not be materially different than that assumed in the calculation of the reserves.
The Company performs an annual impairment review of goodwill. This analysis is performed in the fourth quarter of each year following the Company’s annual forecasting process. The estimated fair market value of goodwill is determined by the discounted cash flow method.
The Company discounts projected operating cash flows using its weighted average cost of capital. To supplement this analysis, the Company compares the market value of its equity, calculated by reference to the quoted market prices of its shares, with the book value of its equity.
The Company has defined benefit pension plans covering most U.S. employees and many non-U.S. employees in high-labor- cost countries. See Note 18.
The Company, in consultation with its actuarial advisors, determines certain key assumptions to be used in calculating the projected benefit obligation and annual pension expense. For the U.S. plans, the assumptions used as of January 1, 2004, for calculating 2004 pension expense were a discount rate of 6.25%, expected rate of increase in compensation levels of 3.5%, and an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 8.5%.
The assumptions used in calculating the U.S. benefit obligations disclosed as of December 31, 2004, were a discount rate of 6.0% and an expected rate of increase in compensation levels of 3.5%. The discount rate is set based on the yields on long-term high-grade corporate bonds and is determined by reference to financial markets on the measurement date. The expected rate of increase in compensation levels and long-term return on plan assets are determined based on a number of factors and must take into account long-term expectations. The U.S. plans have, for a number of years, invested more than 85% of plan assets in equities and the Company has, accordingly, assumed a long-term rate of return on plan assets of 8.5%.
A 1% change in the long-term rate of return on plan assets would result in a change in the U.S. annual pension expense of approximately $0.7 million. A 1% decrease in the discount rate would have increased 2004 U.S. pension expense by approximately $1.6 million and would have increased the December 31, 2004, benefit obligation by approximately $11.9 million. A 1% increase in the expected rate of increase in compensation levels would have increased 2004 pension expense by approximately $2.1 million and would have increased the December 31, 2004 benefit obligation by approximately $7.6 million.
The Company uses the intrinsic value method in accounting for stock options granted to employees. Accordingly, the exercise of stock options is recorded in Shareholders’ equity and no cost is recognized in the income statement. Had the fair market value method been used in 2004, earnings per share would have been reduced by 3 cents using the Black-Scholes method. The use of a Lattice model would not produce a materially different result. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.
Significant judgment is required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of a global business, there are many transactions for which the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. Many of these uncertainties arise as a consequence of intercompany transactions and arrangements. Although the Company believes that its tax return positions are supportable, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of these matters will not be materially different than that which is reflected in the historical income tax provisions and accruals. Such differences could have a material effect on the income tax provisions or benefits in the periods in which such determinations are made. See Note 4.
Various claims, lawsuits and proceedings are pending or threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries, covering a range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities with respect to commercial, product liability and other matters. See Note 16. The Company diligently defends itself in such matters and, in addition, carries insurance coverage to the extent reasonably available against insurable risks. The Company records liabilities for claims, lawsuits and proceedings when they are identified and it is possible to reasonably estimate costs.
The Company believes, based on currently available information, that the resolution of outstanding matters, after taking into account recorded liabilities and available insurance coverage, should not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. However, due to the inherent uncertainty associated with such matters, there can be no assurance that the final outcomes of these matters will not be materially different than currently estimated.